After browsing through many posts I realized that most of my classmates covered what Open Access is about – which is something my main post is lacking in. So, what is open access?
(Source: Created by me)
Open Access is a readily available library of free online articles that have full re-use rights.
Yong You’s post taught me about the pros and cons of Open Access, and stated Wikipedia as one of his examples. This is Wikipedia’s introduction page:
And when zoomed in it states that anyone can edit their page.
(Source: Wikipedia page)
The fact that anyone can edit the page means that some of the information provided on the site is unreliable and not credible. In fact, this article proves that 6 in 10 articles on Wikipedia have factual errors! After earning such a bad reputation, I definitely would not submit my articles to Wikipedia if I was a content creator.
Norman’s post also mentioned about Open Access and related his own musical experience with the concept. He talked about how he is grateful to have free access to online tutorials that taught him how to become a music producer, and expresses his support for open access by uploading his self-produced music that is free to download on Soundcloud.
In my opinion, I think we as internet users are so spoiled by access to free materials, that we have become desensitized to the amount of effort that have been put in to create such content. This is evident in the many cases where a big company approaches a professional for free work. We should definitely correct this mindset by embracing the fact that being a content creator is a legitimate occupation just like any other job, and give these people the respect they deserve. Say no to plagiarism and consider supporting these creatives!
(298 words – excluding photo captions)
Check out the posts I have commented on:
References
- Mail Online. (2016). Iffy-pedia: Up to six in ten articles on Wikipedia contain factual errors. [online] Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2131458/Up-articles-Wikipedia-contain-factual-errors.html [Accessed 16 Nov. 2016].
- PetaPixel. (2016). When a Pulitzer Prize-Winning Photographer is Asked for Free Photos…. [online] Available at: http://petapixel.com/2015/10/06/when-a-pulitzer-prize-winning-photographer-is-asked-for-free-photos/ [Accessed 16 Nov. 2016].
- Rothwell, S. (2016). Should you ever work for free?. [online] Bbc.com. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20150722-should-you-ever-work-for-free [Accessed 16 Nov. 2016].
- Reagan, E. (2016). Watch What Happens When You Ask Non-Creative Professionals to Work for Free. [online] Photographybay.com. Available at: http://www.photographybay.com/2015/11/05/watch-what-happens-when-you-ask-non-creative-professionals-to-work-for-free/ [Accessed 16 Nov. 2016].
- International Business Times UK. (2016). YouTube’s millionaires: 10 highest earning users revealed as PewDiePie takes top spot with $12m a year. [online] Available at: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/youtubes-millionaires-top-10-highest-earning-users-revealed-pewdiepie-taking-top-spot-12m-1524384 [Accessed 16 Nov. 2016].